• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
All of Us or None Newspaper

All of Us or None Newspaper

Your stories matter!

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Features
  • News From Inside
  • Poetry
  • Artwork
  • Archive
  • Donate

Pride in Our Policy: Implementing the Transgender Respect, Agency, and Dignity Act 

June 30, 2025 by AOUON Contributor Leave a Comment

Editor’s Note: As we celebrate Pride Month, we want to recognize and center our transgender and LGBTQ+ members in custody, who face unique challenges and discrimination due to their identities. California has taken steps to improve the conditions transgender people endure in prisons, most notably in 2020 with SB 132: the Transgender Respect, Agency, and Dignity Act. In 2025, CDCR proposed several changes to the implementation of SB 132.

LSPC Staff Attorney Eric C. Sapp wrote to CDCR Undersecretary Johnson and staff about the proposed changes. The letter focused on four main issues in implementation: 1. The erasure of the term gender dysphoria; 2. The maintenance of privacy in the questionnaire process; 3. The burdensome housing transfer request process vs the arbitrary transfer return process; and 4. The incompatibility of search rules with federal Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) standards. Below is a summary and explanation of the letter’s key points. 

1. Erasure of “Gender Dysphoria” 

NCR 25-04 proposed removing the definition of gender dysphoria from the law, with CDCR’s justification explaining that incarcerated persons are now allowed to self-identify. Though this explanation is logical, it leaves room for interpretation that the Department no longer recognizes the condition described by the term. In the future, this could manifest in people invalidating gender dysphoria as a valid diagnosis or basis for accommodation. The Department should clarify now. 

2. Privacy

California Penal Code Section 2605 mandates that the initial intake process includes asking a person entering custody about their gender identity in a private setting, as well as prohibiting discipline for declining to answer. The incarcerated person can amend their identity at any time, and CDCR must repeat the private process as specified above. The proposed changes to implementation merely state that the questionnaire process is to be repeated, without specifying that it must continue to be offered privately. The proposal also gives no regulations as to privacy or accessibility of the Gender Identity Questionnaire when stored in the department’s electronic databases. For the safety and protection of transgender incarcerated people, privacy is critical.

3. Housing Transfers and Return Transfers

Currently, incarcerated people have the right to “be housed at a correctional facility designated for men or women based on the individual’s preference” PC §2606 (emphasis added). Exceptions must be proven to be necessary in writing by the Department. The proposed regulations make the approval process tedious and difficult, and the rejection process easy. In addition, the regulations involve conducting a “social inquiry” with the person’s work or program supervisor, which risks outing someone at a pre-approval stage. The proposed regulations would make it easy for the warden of a receiving institution to send someone back to the institution they came from, which could entail a serious threat to the incarcerated person’s safety. In sum, these proposed changes could lead to acts of discrimination and retaliation, either before the request is successful, after it is unsuccessful, or after a return. 

4. Search Standards and Compliance with the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA)

Possibly most concerningly, these proposed regulations institute new search rules that enable much more invasive searches at a lower standard of circumstances warranting the search. Currently, Federal Regulation 28 CFR § 115.15(f) limits the need to “security,” while CDCR proposed regulations invoke a much wider definition that includes institutional order as well. This lowers the burden of justification on CDCR, enabling them to commit more potentially invasive searches on people without a credible security threat. 

The Department should address the foregoing concerns as the rulemaking progresses.  The Transgender Respect, Agency, and Dignity Act was, in many ways, a historic piece of  legislation, and its implementation by this agency should be up to the tasks of dignity and  respect. 

Filed Under: Policy Update Tagged With: Legal

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Published monthly by All of Us or None,  a project of Legal Services for Prisoners with Children.

Download the printed version of the paper

Top Story

Theses on Labor, Exploitation, & Incarceration

by Eric C. Sapp, LSPC Staff Attorney Prefatory Note: This an abridged version of a text written in spring of 2023, in the context of advocacy regarding carceral wages.  §1     Workers’ rights are human rights; let it be stated unequivocally that incarcerated workers are workers. §2     The prison and industrial capitalism […]

In Texas, AOUON Members Build Collective Power

In July, AOUON’s San Antonio chapter hosted a national convening to bring us together as issues of crimmigration, the new presidential administration, and environmental injustice are deeply impacting us across states, borders, and walls. A multi-generational group of folks impacted by the criminal legal system ranging from toddlers to movement elders, we are leaving with […]

CA Senate Bill 423: Origins, Organizing, and the Fight for Firefighter Justice

by Lawrence Cox, LSPC Regional Advocacy and Organizing Manager I was born in Oakland, California, into a world where stability was elusive and the foster-care docket turned faster than any child could comprehend. I never learned permanence; I learned placement. By age seven, I was a ward of Alameda County, rotating through foster homes and […]

More to See

California Special Election: Prop 50

California has a special election coming up! On November 4th, many Californians will have the chance to vote on Proposition 50, the Election Rigging Response Act. This constitutional amendment, proposed by Governor Gavin Newsom, would create a new congressional district map that favors Democrats for the next three election cycles (through 2030) in an attempt […]

Letter from David Johnson

From the Archives of Ms. Daphne Muse at the Oasis in the Diaspora. c. 1972. Greetings Comrade Sister, I received your most vibrant missive a few days ago, and I must say it was a pleasant surprise hearing from you. In these most critical of times it provided me with a uplift to my spirits, […]

Immigration, Citizenship, and the Constitution (Jurisprudence for Jailhouse Lawyers, Part VI)

by Eric C. Sapp, LSPC Staff Attorney Few provisions of the U.S. Constitution are clearer than the Fourteenth Amendment’s opening clause: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” U.S. Const. Amend. 14, Sec. 1 […]

About AOUON Newspaper

Our All of Us or None Newspaper serves to link those of us who have been locked up, those who are locked up, as well as our families and allies in this struggle.

We want to ensure that the voices of our people inside are heard and that inside artists are recognized for their contributions to this movement.

Your stories matter!

Footer

OUR MISSION

Our All of Us or None Newspaper serves to link those of us who have been locked up, those who are locked up, as well as our families and allies in this struggle.

We want to ensure that the voices of our people inside are heard and that inside artists are recognized for their contributions to this movement.

Your stories matter!

Recent

  • The California Model
  • Foreign Prisons
  • Poem: Seeing the Inevitable
  • Poem: My Eulogy
  • Poem: Three Palm Trees

The AOUON Newspaper is published by LSPC

Copyright © 2025 · All of Us or None Newspaper
Published by Legal Services for Prisoners with Children, a non-profit organization • info@prisonerswithchildren.org